Skip navigation

Category Archives: iphone

For a change, this month’s LFPUG didn’t actually feature any Flash. Instead, we were presented with an introduction to iPhone application development with two single-hour talks delving into developing with Objective-C and the Cocoa Touch environment, but all specifically tailored to take an approach designed for a Web developer’s perspective.

I really don’t know how I feel about iPhone development, as a Flash developer, anyway. There’s been a lot of ‘iPhone for Flash developers’ or ‘Actionscript for the iPhone’ or similarly titled tutorials spring up around the Web lately, which I guess have come about on the back of the over night¬†success stories from applications booming in popularity and the ease with which the App Store lets a small dev team get equal distribution and visibility of their application. But why Actionscript?

The profitability is understandable, I just think it’s strange that specifically Flash developers assume that iPhone development is something they can or should be laying claim to, that it’s something within their domain or their right to be creating these apps? It’s gotten to the point where a Flash platform meeting is hijacked (hijacked isn’t the right word, it wasn’t unwelcome and it drew the biggest turn out I’ve ever seen) – is it selfish (?) that there’s such a demand for tutorials to be made easily digestible for them, when traditionally any other kind of development is usually approached by everyone else peaking in?

I’m not sure, I can’t decide. Maybe it’s more honest – that instead, for example, it’s the look and feel, the slick presentation layer and the interactivity of the interface that’s so attractive (it’s Flash-like) – and a lot of people do start playing with Flash because it looks good. Flash is inherently a visual platform. Maybe Flash just is the closest platform and Flash development easily lends to iPhone development.

Whatever the case, thinking as a platform-agnostic programmer, I was looking forward to the meeting. I have an addiction to learning (or trying) new languages even if I needn’t, plus it was honestly disclosed that this week there would be no Flash content an iPhone 101 bent into shape for Flash developers to understand, it would be was tailored for Web developers generally – I was hoping for more conceptual comparisons rather than perhaps just pointing out syntactical differences – either way, curiosity had the better of me.

First up was Masi Woermann starting with An Introduction to iPhone Application Development. He introduced the broad concepts of iPhone development and the different approach developers must under go to create applications mainly looking at the workflow. Being primarily a Flex developer, Masi maintained comparisons between the architectures of a Flex app and an iPhone app – drawing parallels between Objective-C and Actionscript coding and their relationship to the UI components created with Interface Builder versus MXML.

He introduced the development tools and iPhone SDK, discussed some basics of Objective-C (pointers, memory management, classes) and eventually produced a very simple application – demonstrating the basics of interacting with visual components, straightward methods, getters, setters – some simple OOP.

It was good to see some hands on coding and that, obviously, although it’s a completely different kind of development – it might be intimidating but it’s not impossible. Watch it here:

Masi Woermann - An Introduction to iPhone Application Development

Then Matt Biddulph presented iPhone Development for Web Developers. Matt is primarily server-side developer working with the likes of Python, Ruby and Rails, but instead of going into any code expressed that his real interest in iPhone applications lies in the device’s connectivity, specifically the capability to connect to the Web and interoperate and network with data and objects found there.

He looked at the applications that Twitter and Facebook developed, quoting Joe Hewitt‘s development wisdom with his work at Facebook.

He also criticised some of the failures of the current SDK, as Hewitt also did, specifically that some of the native features that you’ll see in Apple’s applications still aren’t available for third-party developers to utilise. I hadn’t realised this was the case, or would have thought Apple would hold back on anything – I guess with later releases more features will become available. The iPhone OS 3.0 SDK is due for release this summer, perhaps more will become available then.

Watch Matt’s talk here:

Matt Biddulph - iPhone Development for Web Developers

Matt also mentioned Phonegap, an open source cross-platform mobile framework for building apps with JavaScript. It’s been labelled as being ‘like AIR for the iPhone‘ and operates on Android and Blackberry, too. Again, maybe it’s just be another means to cut a corner and not develop with the native environment, but it looks impressive – and it seems powerful. You can take advantage of all the core features of the various platforms – geo-locations, the accelerometer etc.

It’s also created entirely by by Web developers. As the video on their site claims, there’s not many Objective-C developers but there are a lot of Web developers – so in keeping with the rest of these observations, there really are more and more opportunities and points of entry for Web developers to get into mobile and iPhone app development, it’s purely demand that has created these.

All in all, whether it’s ‘in favour’ or not for Flash developers to want to develop iPhone apps is probably irrelevant – whether its a for profit or to expand a skillset probably doesn’t mater either. Hopefully all the attention will cause a shift in the perception of developing for mobile devices in general, I know I still cringe whenever anyone mentions Flash Lite – but it seems that’s starting to enjoying the beginnings of a resurgence too.

Then I think of initiatives like Adobe’s Open Screen Project and think this could be a really exciting time for mobile devices regardless, maybe there’s just so much fuss over the iPhone right now because it’s the iPhone.

As I write this post an email has just arrived in my inbox announcing there’s new group meeting specifically for developing iPhone, the London iPhone Bootcamp – ‘part seminar, part hackathon, part workshop’ – they too, are looking for the next killer iPhone app!



A couple weeks back I spoke about Adobe’s possible development on a new Flash platform for the iPhone.

This week the Guardian has an interview with Shantanu Narayen, Adobe CEO, offering some comments on Apple’s position:

“Everything that goes onto the iPhone when it’s shipped needs their cooperation. What we really want is Flash built as a plug-in to Safari on the iPhone. But it’s working; I’ve seen demos of it.”

Hopefully then there’s more promise in the idea rather than just being the product of the rumour mill that it almost looked like before.

As the article says, it would be a significant turnaround for Apple. If the device supports the Flash plug-in, it could potentially offer a future implementation where iPhone applications can be developed in Flash. I know it’s an intimidating task for web developers to look at programming Cocoa and Objective-C.

His comments aren’t the main focus of the interview though, Narayen instead airs his views that Microsoft are muscling in on Adobe’s online video market, accusing them of ‘opening their checkbook’ in a failed attempt to convert companies from Flash to their new Silverlight player.

I’ve not developed with Silverlight, or really have any pressing desire to – and the most recent Flash vs. Silverlight stats probably point to not having to for the majority of clients any time soon, either. The latest statistics post Flash video at an 86% market share against Silverlight at 13% (though US based).

It’s no coincidence that Microsoft released Silverlight 2 so close to the Flash Player 10 launch last month. But can it compare? Some people love it, others are undecided¬†– but if anything, Silverlight need to stop losing big companies. BBC have changed to Flash, NBC quite notably for their NFL coverage too.

Then last week, the New York Times reported:

A Microsoft official cited on Tuesday improvements planned for the company’s Silverlight platform for rich Internet applications, including intentions to run Silverlight applications outside of a browser.

If Microsoft want to get competitive with Adobe, they need to do this – assuming of course they maintain cross-platform support. Then they really can go head-to-head.

They bring with them a mass of .NET and WPF developers. Breaking out the browser, with these, could potentially shadow Adobe AIR in the desktop RIA market – which is still relatively basic in it’s file system and native platform/OS integration.

Alas, it would seem the time has come. Paul Betlem, Senior Director of Engineering at Adobe, ‘confirmed’ earlier this week that Adobe are developing a Flash Player for the iPhone. It’s left the Flash community buzzing since the announcement was made at Flash on the Beach on Tuesday.

As a rumour, it’s been bounced around the Web for a while now (1, 2, 3), and Serge Jespers implores it’s nothing new. Perhaps it’s simply the next logical progression in the growth of the iPhone, or an inevitability in attempting to cure Steve Jobs’ Goldilocks syndrome.

His is a stance is one I can completely understand, I agree with the quote Mike Downey finds from Shantanu Narayan, Adobe CEO, in his belief that Flash is synonymous with the Internet. Poor support in the restrictions of Flash Lite could spoil the (otherwise, almost faultless) iPhone experience, or otherwise not be worth the effort that would be involved in it’s integration.

If this does come to fruition, I doubt it’ll be an upgrade for the current second generation iPhone anytime soon, it would certainly be too CPU intensive for it’s predecessor.

Sarah Perez at ReadWriteWeb though, asks a different question – Do We Care?

Looking at the comments and the poll results, apparently we do. Personally, I think it could offer almost boundless opportunity for current Flash developers.

Diggnation this week covered a story of rags-to-riches, posting the iTunes App Store as virtual gold mine for indie developers. Steve Demeter, developer of $5 iPhone game Trism, announced he made $250,000 in profit in just two months. The immediacy and simplicity in getting your application visibility on the app store means any project, like the effort from Demeter’s four-man crew, can contend an equal playing field – an ‘exciting new landscape’ as opposed to today’s overcrowded world of dot-coms, as the article puts forward.